IndisputableMonolith.StandardModel.StrongCP
Module treating the QCD strong-CP angle θ as a Recognition cost variable on the eight-tick clock. It packages the experimental EDM bound, the fine-tuning problem, axion dynamics, and a J-cost argument that selects θ = 0. Downstream forcing-chain work cites it when closing Standard-Model CP structure from the cost foundation.
claimThe QCD vacuum angle $\theta$ is treated as a real parameter whose physical effects (neutron EDM, fine-tuning) are bounded experimentally. Recognition Science assigns a $J$-cost $J(\theta)$ on the eight-tick phase lattice and proves that $\theta = 0$ uniquely minimizes that cost, thereby selecting a CP-conserving strong sector without an axion as a logical necessity (while still recording the axion solution as the conventional alternative).
background
In QCD the topological term $\theta,G\tilde{G}$ is CP-odd. Experiment (neutron EDM) forces $|\theta|\lesssim 10^{-10}$, the strong-CP problem. The conventional fix is a dynamical axion that relaxes $\theta$ to zero.
Recognition Science instead views $\theta$ as a phase on the fundamental eight-tick clock (phases $k\pi/4$, $k=0,\ldots,7$). The module imports the RS time quantum $\tau_0$ and the EightTick discrete clock, then defines a $J$-cost on admissible $\theta$ values. Sibling declarations cover the experimental bound, neutron EDM, fine-tuning measure, axion properties and dark-matter role, the allowed set, the cost functional, and the uniqueness of the zero minimum.
The local claim is that cost minimization, not a new particle, forces $\theta=0$.
proof idea
Definition-and-selection module rather than a single theorem. It introduces $\Theta_{\mathrm{QCD}}$ and the experimental window, records the axion solution as background, then builds a $J$-cost on allowed $\theta$. Two core lemmas show that $\theta=0$ minimizes the cost and is therefore selected. Supporting material packages EDM, fine-tuning, and axion dark-matter facts used by later forcing arguments. No deep tactic scripts at module level; the work is the cost identification plus the zero-minimum theorems.
why it matters in Recognition Science
Feeds IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.UnifiedForcingChain, whose doc-comment states that all of T0–T8 are forced from the cost foundation (Recognition Composition Law). Strong-CP closure is part of making the Standard Model’s discrete CP structure inevitable once $J$ and the eight-tick octave (T7) are fixed. The module supplies the RS-native reason $\theta=0$ is preferred, so the forcing chain need not treat strong CP as an extra postulate. It also keeps the axion route visible for comparison with conventional phenomenology.
scope and limits
- Does not derive the numerical EDM bound from first principles; it records the experimental window.
- Does not prove axion non-existence; axion material is retained as the standard alternative.
- Does not compute hadronic matrix elements or lattice QCD topology.
- Does not by itself force electroweak CP violation or the CKM phase.
- Does not replace the full UnifiedForcingChain; it only supplies the strong-CP fragment.
used by (1)
depends on (2)
declarations in this module (26)
-
structure
ThetaQCD -
def
theta_experimental_bound -
def
neutronEDM -
theorem
theta_finetuning -
def
thetaContributions -
structure
AxionSolution -
def
axionProperties -
def
axionDarkMatter -
def
allowedTheta -
def
thetaJCost -
theorem
theta_zero_minimizes -
theorem
theta_zero_selected -
def
comparison -
theorem
rs_axion_compatible -
def
experimentalTests -
def
summary -
structure
StrongCPCert -
def
strongCPCert -
def
theta_RS_predicted -
def
theta_experimental_max -
theorem
theta_RS_inside_experimental -
theorem
abs_theta_RS_lt_bound -
theorem
strong_cp_gap -
structure
StrongCPNumericalCert -
def
strongCPNumericalCert -
structure
StrongCPFalsifier