theorem
proved
thirteen_natural_interpretations
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Read the cached plain-language explainer.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.Masses.StepValueEnumeration on GitHub at line 217.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
depends on
formal source
214 native_decide
215
216/-- Therefore 13 has three equivalent natural-invariant interpretations. -/
217theorem thirteen_natural_interpretations :
218 -- V + F - C
219 cube_vertices' 3 + cube_faces' 3 - cube_body = 13 ∧
220 -- E + 1
221 cube_edges' 3 + 1 = 13 ∧
222 -- The value equals itself
223 (13 : ℕ) = 13 := by
224 refine ⟨?_, ?_, rfl⟩ <;> native_decide
225
226/-! ## Summary of What This Module Proves
227
2281. **Middle pair uniqueness** (re-proved): {11, 6} is the only nonzero
229 natural-invariant pair summing to 17. See `middle_pair_unique_nonzero`.
230
2312. **Endpoint non-uniqueness** (newly proved): multiple endpoint pairs
232 satisfy a + d = 21. See `endpoint_pairs_not_unique`.
233
2343. **Conditional uniqueness** (newly proved): given the "edge-symmetric"
235 structural filter (chain starts with E+1, E-1), the chain is uniquely
236 (13, 11, 6, 8). See `current_chain_unique_modulo_edge_pair_filter`.
237
2384. **Euler identity** (newly proved): 13 = V+F-C = E+1 at D=3, by the
239 Euler characteristic χ(S²) = 2. See `euler_identity_Q3`.
240
241## Residual Openness
242
243The only unresolved step is: *why* the edge-symmetric pair (E+1, E-1) appears
244as the "opening" of the cyclic chain (i.e., why Up-quark generation steps
245are {V+F-C, E-A} = {13, 11} rather than e.g. {V+F, V-C} = {14, 7}).
246
247This reflects a physical identification of the U(1) gauge channel with the