pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 0705.0290 · v2 · submitted 2007-05-02 · 🌌 astro-ph · hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

PArthENoPE: Public Algorithm Evaluating the Nucleosynthesis of Primordial Elements

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph hep-ph
keywords programabundanceschemicalcosmologicalelementsequilibriumneutrinonuclear
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We describe a program for computing the abundances of light elements produced during Big Bang Nucleosynthesis which is publicly available at http://parthenope.na.infn.it/. Starting from nuclear statistical equilibrium conditions the program solves the set of coupled ordinary differential equations, follows the departure from chemical equilibrium of nuclear species, and determines their asymptotic abundances as function of several input cosmological parameters as the baryon density, the number of effective neutrino, the value of cosmological constant and the neutrino chemical potential. The program requires commercial NAG library routines.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bipartite Solution to the Lithium Problem

    hep-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    A sequential majoron-to-neutrinos decay followed by axion-like particle-to-photons decay can lower primordial lithium without exceeding deuterium limits.

  2. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    astro-ph.CO 2018-07 accept novelty 5.0

    Final Planck CMB data confirms the flat 6-parameter ΛCDM model with Ω_c h² = 0.120 ± 0.001, Ω_b h² = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, n_s = 0.965 ± 0.004, τ = 0.054 ± 0.007, H_0 = 67.4 ± 0.5 km/s/Mpc, and no strong evidence for extensions.

  3. Probing Unification Scenarios with Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Extending a BBN code yields constraints Δα/α = 2 ± 51 ppm (mass variation) and 2 ± 22 ppm (G variation) at 68% CL, showing these models do not solve the lithium problem.