Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Two Component Model of Dark Energy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0708.2977 v2 pith:TNONUIT2 submitted 2007-08-22 astro-ph

Two Component Model of Dark Energy

classification astro-ph
keywords modelcomponentdatadarkenergyxcdmcriteriagive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the possibility that the dark energy is made up of two or more independent components, each having a different equation of state. We fit the model with supernova and gamma-ray burst (GRB) data from resent observations, and use the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique to estimate the allowed parameter regions. We also use various model selection criteria to compare the two component model with the LCDM, one component dark energy model with static or variable w(XCDM), and with other multi-component models. We find that the two component models can give reasonably good fit to the current data. For some data sets, and depending somewhat on the model selection criteria, the two component model can give better fit to the data than XCDM with static w and XCDM with variable w parameterized by w = w_0 + w_az/(1+z).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cosmological Constraints on the DGP Model in light of DESI DR2 2025 Data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0

    DESI DR2 combined with CC, SNIa and CMB priors give H0≈63–64 km s−1 Mpc−1 for flat/non-flat DGP and ΔAIC>100 against ΛCDM, strongly disfavoring the model.