Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

How well do we understand cosmological recombination?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0711.1357 v2 pith:S4ZIZS5Q submitted 2007-11-08 astro-ph

How well do we understand cosmological recombination?

classification astro-ph
keywords recombinationcosmologicalhydrogenparameterscentheliumplanckeffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The major theoretical limitation for extracting cosmological parameters from the CMB sky lies in the precision with which we can calculate the cosmological recombination process. Uncertainty in the details of hydrogen and helium recombination could effectively increase the errors or bias the values of the cosmological parameters derived from the Planck satellite, for example. Here we modify the cosmological recombination code RECFAST by introducing one more parameter to reproduce the recent numerical results for the speed-up of the helium recombination. Together with the existing hydrogen fudge factor, we vary these two parameters to account for the remaining dominant uncertainties in cosmological recombination. By using the CosmoMC code with Planck forecast data, we find that we need to determine the parameters to better than ten per cent for He I and one per cent for H, in order to obtain negligible effects on the cosmological parameters. For helium recombination, if the existing studies have calculated the ionization fraction to the 0.1 per cent level by properly including the relevant physical processes, then we already have numerical calculations which are accurate enough for Planck. For hydrogen, setting the fudge factor to speed up low redshift recombination by 14 per cent appears to be sufficient for Planck. However, more work still needs to be done to carry out comprehensive numerical calculations of all the relevant effects for hydrogen, as well as to check for effects which couple hydrogen and helium recombinaton through the radiation field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CAMB v2: cosmological power spectra for high-precision surveys

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    CAMB v2's default settings produce lensed CMB and matter power spectra converged to 10^-3 over survey-relevant scales, using a new flat-Bessel mapping for hyperspherical Bessel functions.

  2. Reconstructing dark energy with fewer assumptions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bin-wise uncorrelated reconstruction from DESI/SDSS BAO and Pantheon+/Union3.1/DES-Dovekie supernovae yields dark energy density peaking then declining and equation of state oscillating with phantom crossing near z~0....