pith. sign in

arxiv: 0712.0324 · v2 · submitted 2007-12-03 · ✦ hep-th

Explaining the Pure Spinor Formalism for the Superstring

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords formalismpurespinorbrstoperatorconstraintsoperatorsfermions
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

After adding a pair of non-minimal fields and performing a similarity transformation, the BRST operator in the pure spinor formalism is expressed as a conventional-looking BRST operator involving the Virasoro constraint and (b,c) ghosts, together with 12 fermionic constraints. This BRST operator can be obtained by gauge-fixing the Green-Schwarz superstring where the 8 first-class and 8 second-class Green-Schwarz constraints are combined into 12 first-class constraints. Alternatively, the pure spinor BRST operator can be obtained from the RNS formalism by twisting the ten spin-half RNS fermions into five spin-one and five spin-zero fermions, and using the SO(10)/U(5) pure spinor variables to parameterize the different ways of twisting. GSO(-) vertex operators in the pure spinor formalism are constructed using spin fields and picture-changing operators in a manner analogous to Ramond vertex operators in the RNS formalism.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Searching for the pseudoscalar partner of $G(3900)$ via radiative $Y(4230)$ decays

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Calculates B(Y(4230) → γ G0(3900)) = 3.8×10^{-5}–3.3×10^{-4} assuming P-wave molecular interpretations for both states and a triangle mechanism.