pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 0809.0898 · v1 · submitted 2008-09-05 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: unknown

The Aquarius Project: the subhalos of galactic halos

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords subhaloshalomasshalossubstructurecirculardarklargest
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We have performed the largest ever particle simulation of a Milky Way-sized dark matter halo, and present the most comprehensive convergence study for an individual dark matter halo carried out thus far. We have also simulated a sample of 6 ultra-highly resolved Milky-way sized halos, allowing us to estimate the halo-to-halo scatter in substructure statistics. In our largest simulation, we resolve nearly 300,000 gravitationally bound subhalos within the virialized region of the halo. Simulations of the same object differing in mass resolution by factors up to 1800 accurately reproduce the largest subhalos with the same mass, maximum circular velocity and position, and yield good convergence for the abundance and internal properties of dark matter substructures. We detect up to four generations of subhalos within subhalos, but contrary to recent claims, we find less substructure in subhalos than in the main halo when regions of equal mean overdensity are compared. The overall substructure mass fraction is much lower in subhalos than in the main halo. Extrapolating the main halo's subhalo mass spectrum down to an Earth mass, we predict the mass fraction in substructure to be well below 3% within 100 kpc, and to be below 0.1% within the Solar Circle. The inner density profiles of subhalos show no sign of converging to a fixed asymptotic slope and are well fit by gently curving profiles of Einasto form. The mean concentrations of isolated halos are accurately described by the fitting formula of Neto et al. down to maximum circular velocities of 1.5 km/s, an extrapolation over some 5 orders of magnitude in mass. However, at equal maximum circular velocity, subhalos are more concentrated than field halos, with a characteristic density that is typically ~2.6 times larger and increases towards the halo centre.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Broken Similarity: Sinking and Merging of Dark Matter Subhalos Across Hierarchical Levels

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In LambdaCDM simulations, over 90% of subhalo sinking events occur between adjacent hierarchy levels, satellite-satellite mergers can rival central-satellite rates at low masses, and the overall merger landscape devia...

  2. Caught in the Cosmic Web: Environmental Impacts on the Halo Substructure Boosts to Dark Matter Annihilation Signals

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    At fixed host-halo mass, filament halos show mass-dependent boost modulation from 15% suppression to 12% enhancement, walls are intermediate, and void halos are suppressed by 30-33% relative to the cosmic-mean prediction.

  3. JWST Lensed Quasar Dark Matter Survey V: Measuring the minimum halo mass with strong gravitational lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Strong lensing of 28 quasars constrains the CDM halo mass function cutoff to m_low < 10^{8.3} solar masses at 10:1 odds.

  4. Strong-field signatures of a regular black hole in an Einasto dark matter halo

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Regular black holes in Einasto dark matter halos show the strongest deviations from Schwarzschild in photon sphere and shadow properties near a critical halo parameter, remaining consistent with Sgr A* but mildly disf...

  5. Bayesian Analysis of Gravitational Wave Microlensing Effects from Galactic Double White Dwarfs

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian analysis of simulated Taiji observations shows microlensing from lenses above 10^5 solar masses can be distinguished from unlensed DWD signals when separation is below 3 Einstein radii, while lower masses or ...