pith. sign in

arxiv: 0811.1645 · v1 · submitted 2008-11-11 · 📊 stat.AP

Random survival forests

classification 📊 stat.AP
keywords survivalforestsdatarandomexamplesintroducedmissingmortality
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We introduce random survival forests, a random forests method for the analysis of right-censored survival data. New survival splitting rules for growing survival trees are introduced, as is a new missing data algorithm for imputing missing data. A conservation-of-events principle for survival forests is introduced and used to define ensemble mortality, a simple interpretable measure of mortality that can be used as a predicted outcome. Several illustrative examples are given, including a case study of the prognostic implications of body mass for individuals with coronary artery disease. Computations for all examples were implemented using the freely available R-software package, randomSurvivalForest.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ChronoSurv: A Clinical Pathway-Guided Graph Framework for Multimodal Survival Analysis

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ChronoSurv proposes a directed graph framework for multimodal survival analysis that models clinical pathways with hierarchical and heterogeneous message passing.

  2. A Large-Scale Neutral Comparison Study of Survival Models on Low-Dimensional Data

    stat.ML 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Large-scale neutral benchmark of survival models on low-dimensional right-censored data finds Cox PH performs comparably to more complex methods across discrimination, calibration, and predictive metrics.

  3. Federated Survival Analysis in Healthcare: A Multi-Model Evaluation on Cross-Institutional Heterogeneous Breast Cancer Data

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Federated training of Cox, DeepSurv, and Random Survival Forest models on cross-institutional breast cancer data outperforms local training and approaches centralized performance, with RSF showing the best overall balance.