pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 0811.2803 · v3 · submitted 2008-11-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.other· physics.optics

Recognition: unknown

Entanglement detection

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.otherphysics.optics
keywords entanglementbeendetectiongiveninequalitiesmethodsseveralstate
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

How can one prove that a given state is entangled? In this paper we review different methods that have been proposed for entanglement detection. We first explain the basic elements of entanglement theory for two or more particles and then entanglement verification procedures such as Bell inequalities, entanglement witnesses, the determination of nonlinear properties of a quantum state via measurements on several copies, and spin squeezing inequalities. An emphasis is given on the theory and application of entanglement witnesses. We also discuss several experiments, where some of the presented methods have been implemented.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Leggett-Garg Inequality Violations Bound Quantum Fisher Information

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Leggett-Garg inequality violations yield lower bounds on quantum Fisher information in stationary pure and thermal states, serving as a witness for many-body quantum coherence.