Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Invisible Major Mergers: Why the Definition of a Galaxy Merger Ratio Matters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0902.2214 v1 pith:4X5TOW5T submitted 2009-02-13 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

Invisible Major Mergers: Why the Definition of a Galaxy Merger Ratio Matters

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords massgalaxydarkmattermergersratiomassesmerger
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The mapping between dark matter halo mass, galaxy stellar mass, and galaxy cold gas mass is not a simple linear relation, but is influenced by a wide array of galaxy formation processes. We implement observationally-normalized relations between dark matter halo mass, stellar mass, and cold gas mass to explore these mappings, with specific emphasis on the correlation between different definitions of a major galaxy merger. We always define a major merger by a mass ratio m/M>0.3, but allow the masses used to compute this ratio to be defined in one of three ways: dark matter halo masses, galaxy stellar masses, or galaxy baryonic masses (stars and cold gas). We find that the merger ratio assigned to any particular merger event depends strongly on which of these masses is used, with the mapping between different mass ratio definitions showing strong evolution with halo mass and redshift. For example, major dark matter mergers (>0.3) in small galaxies (M_DM < 10^11 Msun) typically correspond to very minor stellar mergers (<1/20). These mergers contain significant dark matter mass, and should cause noticable morphological disruption to the primary galaxy, even though there is no observable bright companion. In massive galaxies, there is an opposite effect, with bright companion galaxies corresponding to only minor dark matter mergers. We emphasize that great care must be taken when comparing mergers based on different mass ratio definitions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The AGORA High-resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project. IX - Part 1: Effects of a Major Galaxy Merger on Star Formation of a Milky Way-mass Galaxy Progenitor

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In nine matched cosmological simulations of a Milky Way-progenitor major merger at z≈4.5, the timing and strength of the merger-induced starburst depend on whether the code uses kinetic, thermal, or delayed-cooling st...