REVIEW 2 cited by
Periastron Passage Triggering of the 19th Century Eruptions of Eta Carinae
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Periastron Passage Triggering of the 19th Century Eruptions of Eta Carinae
read the original abstract
We reconstruct the evolution of Eta Carinae in the last two centuries, under the assumption that the two 19th century eruptions were triggered by periastron passages, and by that constrain the binary parameters. The beginning of the Lesser Eruption (LE) at the end of the 19th century occurred when the system was very close to periastron passage, suggesting that the secondary triggered the LE. We assume that the 1838-1858 Great Eruption (GE) was triggered by a periastron passage as well. We also assume that mass transferred from the primary to the secondary star accounts for the extra energy of the GE. With these assumptions we constrain the total mass of the binary system to be M=M_1+M_2>~250 solar masses. These higher than commonly used masses better match the observed luminosity with stellar evolutionary tracks. Including mass loss by the two stars and mass transfer from the primary to the secondary we obtain a good match of periastron passages to the two peaks in the light curve of the GE. Based on these finding and a similar behavior of P Cygni, we speculate that major LBV eruptions are triggered by stellar companions, and that in extreme cases a short duration event with a huge mass transfer rate can lead to a bright transient event on time scales of weeks to months (a ``supernova impostor'').
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The IACOB project XIX. Revisiting massive-star evolution with empirical TAMS constraints: updated models, overshoot calibration, and the population of blue supergiants
Massive-star models require mass-dependent core overshoot (α_ov ≈ 0.18–0.45) to match the empirical TAMS, but still fail to explain the velocity dependence of the TAMS and the observed blue supergiant population.
-
High Power Accretion in Massive Binary Systems and the Impact of Metallicity
Higher-metallicity massive stars show larger accretion-driven luminosity increases despite being more extended, and flip to a cool inflated state at lower accretion rates than low-metallicity stars.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.