REVIEW 2 cited by
An analytical approximation of the luminosity distance in flat cosmologies with a cosmological constant
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
An analytical approximation of the luminosity distance in flat cosmologies with a cosmological constant
read the original abstract
We present an analytical approximation formula for the luminosity distance in spatially flat cosmologies with dust and a cosmological constant. Apart from the overall factor, the effect of non-zero cosmological constant in our formula is written simply in terms of a rational function. We also show the approximate formulae for the Dyer-Roeder distance (empty beam case) and the generalized angular diameter distance from redshift $z_1$ to $z_2$, which are particularly useful in analyzing the gravitational lens effects. Our formulae are widely applicable over the range of the density parameter and the redshift with sufficiently small uncertainties. In particular, in the range of density parameter $0.3 \leq \Omega_{\rm m} \leq 1$ and redshift $0.03 \leq z \leq 1000$, the relative error for the luminosity distance by our formula is always smaller than that of the recent work by Wickramasinghe and Ukwatta (2010). Hence, we hope that our formulae will be an efficient and useful tool for exploring various problems in observational cosmology.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
KiDS+VIKING-450 cosmology with Bayesian hierarchical model redshift distributions
Bayesian hierarchical modeling of photometric redshifts in KiDS+VIKING-450 raises S8 to 0.756 ± 0.039 and reduces Planck tension to 1.9σ.
-
Pad\'e Approximants for cosmic Dispersion Measures
Padé approximants reproduce the FRB diffuse dispersion measure integral to within a few percent while evaluating 2–17 times faster than numerical quadrature.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.