REVIEW 2 cited by
A Logical Characterization of Constraint-Based Causal Discovery
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a novel approach to constraint-based causal discovery, that takes the form of straightforward logical inference, applied to a list of simple, logical statements about causal relations that are derived directly from observed (in)dependencies. It is both sound and complete, in the sense that all invariant features of the corresponding partial ancestral graph (PAG) are identified, even in the presence of latent variables and selection bias. The approach shows that every identifiable causal relation corresponds to one of just two fundamental forms. More importantly, as the basic building blocks of the method do not rely on the detailed (graphical) structure of the corresponding PAG, it opens up a range of new opportunities, including more robust inference, detailed accountability, and application to large models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Causal ASCEND: Scalable Two-tier Causal Discovery on High Dimensional Multi-omics Data
ASCEND recovers ancestral gene relationships at omics scale by conditioning only on dynamically updated nearest ancestors under a known two-tier ordering, with polynomial complexity and higher precision than GRN and c...
-
Multi-omic Causal Discovery using Genotypes and Gene Expression
GENESIS infers gene regulatory relationships by using genotype variants to anchor constraint-based causal discovery, but the paper's theoretical guarantees and empirical validation are insufficient to support the claims.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.