pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1203.3515 · v1 · submitted 2012-03-15 · 📊 stat.ME · cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

On the Validity of Covariate Adjustment for Estimating Causal Effects

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 📊 stat.ME cs.AI
keywords covariateadjustmentcausalcriterionconfounderseffectsoutcometreatment
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Identifying effects of actions (treatments) on outcome variables from observational data and causal assumptions is a fundamental problem in causal inference. This identification is made difficult by the presence of confounders which can be related to both treatment and outcome variables. Confounders are often handled, both in theory and in practice, by adjusting for covariates, in other words considering outcomes conditioned on treatment and covariate values, weighed by probability of observing those covariate values. In this paper, we give a complete graphical criterion for covariate adjustment, which we term the adjustment criterion, and derive some interesting corollaries of the completeness of this criterion.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Generalization of Pearl's Front-Door Criterion

    math.ST 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new weakened set of graph conditions makes the front-door formula valid for identifying total causal effects under latent confounding in more cases than Pearl's original criterion.

  2. An adaptive variance estimator for relative sparsity

    stat.ME 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new adaptive variance estimator for relative sparsity coefficients is introduced that fully utilizes the prior asymptotic normality theorem and incorporates variable selection effects.