pith. sign in

arxiv: 1204.5708 · v1 · pith:6VXKVRKEnew · submitted 2012-04-25 · 🪐 quant-ph

Bell inequality and common causal explanation in algebraic quantum field theory

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords bellcommoncausalinequalitiesnon-classicalexplanationquantumclassical
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Bell inequalities, understood as constraints between classical conditional probabilities, can be derived from a set of assumptions representing a common causal explanation of classical correlations. A similar derivation, however, is not known for Bell inequalities in algebraic quantum field theories establishing constraints for the expectation of specific linear combinations of projections in a quantum state. In the paper we address the question as to whether a 'common causal justification' of these non-classical Bell inequalities is possible. We will show that although the classical notion of common causal explanation can readily be generalized for the non-classical case, the Bell inequalities used in quantum theories cannot be derived from these non-classical common causes. Just the opposite is true: for a set of correlations there can be given a non-classical common causal explanation even if they violate the Bell inequalities. This shows that the range of common causal explanations in the non-classical case is wider than that restricted by the Bell inequalities.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bell's theorem: why probability factorisation fails

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Bell-type correlations are reinterpreted as sequential single-spin auto-correlations under counterfactual equivalence, explaining non-locality via state-altering measurements on undefined quantities.