Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Third-Epoch Magellanic Cloud Proper Motions I: HST/WFC3 data and Orbit Implications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1301.0832 v1 pith:SMGEH6BL submitted 2013-01-04 astro-ph.CO

Third-Epoch Magellanic Cloud Proper Motions I: HST/WFC3 data and Orbit Implications

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords propermotioncloudsdatamagellanicmilkymotionsbaseline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present proper motions for the Large & Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC & SMC) based on three epochs of \textit{Hubble Space Telescope} data, spanning a $\sim 7$ yr baseline, and centered on fields with background QSOs. The first two epochs, the subject of past analyses, were obtained with ACS/HRC, and have been reanalyzed here. The new third epoch with WFC3/UVIS increases the time baseline and provides better control of systematics. The three-epoch data yield proper motion random errors of only 1-2% per field. For the LMC this is sufficient to constrain the internal proper motion dynamics, as will be discussed in a separate paper. Here we focus on the implied center-of-mass proper motions: mu_W(LMC) = -1.910 +/- 0.020 mas/yr, mu_N(LMC) = 0.229 +/- 0.047 mas/yr, and mu_W(SMC) = -0.772 +/- 0.063 mas/yr, mu_N(SMC) = -1.117 +/- 0.061 mas/yr. We combine the results with a revised understanding of the solar motion in the Milky Way to derive Galactocentric velocities: v_{tot,LMC} = 321 +/- 24 km/s and v_{tot,SMC} = 217 +/- 26 km/s. Our proper motion uncertainties are now dominated by limitations in our understanding of the internal kinematics and geometry of the Clouds, and our velocity uncertainties are dominated by distance errors. Orbit calculations for the Clouds around the Milky Way allow a range of orbital periods, depending on the uncertain masses of the Milky Way and LMC. Periods $\lesssim 4$ Gyr are ruled out, which poses a challenge for traditional Magellanic Stream models. First-infall orbits are preferred (as supported by other arguments as well) if one imposes the requirement that the LMC and SMC must have been a bound pair for at least several Gyr.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LMC-induced Perturbations in the Milky Way Halo II: Bridging Field-level Inference and Summary-level Simulation-Based Inference

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A field-level flow-matching likelihood shows the raw 6D halo phase-space distribution carries 2.5-9.9x more MW-LMC parameter information than velocity moments; adding BFE+MOPED summaries recovers much of this gap.

  2. Reconstructing Galactic Gravitational Potentials from Stellar Kinematics with Physics-Informed Neural Networks

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A PINN approach learns galactic gravitational potentials from acceleration data, achieving sub-percent errors on simulations while outperforming analytic models and retaining interpretability via structured priors.

  3. The VMC survey -- LV. The coherent expansion of the SMC

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Improved VMC proper motions show SMC expansion along SE-NW axes consistent with LMC tides, radial inward motions with no rotation, and northward motion in older RGB stars from a prior interaction.