REVIEW 3 cited by
Third-Epoch Magellanic Cloud Proper Motions I: HST/WFC3 data and Orbit Implications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Third-Epoch Magellanic Cloud Proper Motions I: HST/WFC3 data and Orbit Implications
read the original abstract
We present proper motions for the Large & Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC & SMC) based on three epochs of \textit{Hubble Space Telescope} data, spanning a $\sim 7$ yr baseline, and centered on fields with background QSOs. The first two epochs, the subject of past analyses, were obtained with ACS/HRC, and have been reanalyzed here. The new third epoch with WFC3/UVIS increases the time baseline and provides better control of systematics. The three-epoch data yield proper motion random errors of only 1-2% per field. For the LMC this is sufficient to constrain the internal proper motion dynamics, as will be discussed in a separate paper. Here we focus on the implied center-of-mass proper motions: mu_W(LMC) = -1.910 +/- 0.020 mas/yr, mu_N(LMC) = 0.229 +/- 0.047 mas/yr, and mu_W(SMC) = -0.772 +/- 0.063 mas/yr, mu_N(SMC) = -1.117 +/- 0.061 mas/yr. We combine the results with a revised understanding of the solar motion in the Milky Way to derive Galactocentric velocities: v_{tot,LMC} = 321 +/- 24 km/s and v_{tot,SMC} = 217 +/- 26 km/s. Our proper motion uncertainties are now dominated by limitations in our understanding of the internal kinematics and geometry of the Clouds, and our velocity uncertainties are dominated by distance errors. Orbit calculations for the Clouds around the Milky Way allow a range of orbital periods, depending on the uncertain masses of the Milky Way and LMC. Periods $\lesssim 4$ Gyr are ruled out, which poses a challenge for traditional Magellanic Stream models. First-infall orbits are preferred (as supported by other arguments as well) if one imposes the requirement that the LMC and SMC must have been a bound pair for at least several Gyr.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
LMC-induced Perturbations in the Milky Way Halo II: Bridging Field-level Inference and Summary-level Simulation-Based Inference
A field-level flow-matching likelihood shows the raw 6D halo phase-space distribution carries 2.5-9.9x more MW-LMC parameter information than velocity moments; adding BFE+MOPED summaries recovers much of this gap.
-
Reconstructing Galactic Gravitational Potentials from Stellar Kinematics with Physics-Informed Neural Networks
A PINN approach learns galactic gravitational potentials from acceleration data, achieving sub-percent errors on simulations while outperforming analytic models and retaining interpretability via structured priors.
-
The VMC survey -- LV. The coherent expansion of the SMC
Improved VMC proper motions show SMC expansion along SE-NW axes consistent with LMC tides, radial inward motions with no rotation, and northward motion in older RGB stars from a prior interaction.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.