Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Statistics of extreme objects in the Juropa Hubble Volume simulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1305.1976 v2 pith:OVR7LZMP submitted 2013-05-08 astro-ph.CO

Statistics of extreme objects in the Juropa Hubble Volume simulation

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords distributionsimulationvolumeclustersmassobjectsclustercosmological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the first results from the JUropa huBbLE volumE (Jubilee) project, based a large N-body, dark matter-only cosmological simulation with a volume of $V=(6 h^{-1}\mathrm{Gpc})^3$, containing 6000$^3$ particles, performed within the concordance $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model. The simulation volume is sufficient to probe extremely large length scales in the universe, whilst at the same time the particle count is high enough so that dark matter haloes down to $1.5\times10^{12} h^{-1}\mathrm{M}_\odot$ can be resolved. At $z = 0$ we identify over 400 million haloes. The cluster mass function is derived using three different halofinders and compared to fitting functions in the literature. The distribution of clusters of maximal mass across redshifts agrees well with predicted masses of extreme objects, and we explicitly confirm that the Poisson distribution is very good at describing the distribution of rare clusters. The Poisson distribution also matches well the level to which cosmic variance can be expected to affect number counts of high mass clusters. We find that objects like the Bullet cluster exist in the far-tail of the distribution of mergers in terms of relative collisional speed. We also derive the number counts of voids in the simulation box for $z = 0$, $0.5$ and $1$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Morphology-spin connection in the SAMI Galaxy Survey

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Bulge prominence and ellipticity are the strongest photometric predictors of galaxy spin, with age and mass secondary in SAMI data.

  2. glmSTARMA -- An R-Package for fitting autoregressive spatio-temporal models following generalized linear models

    stat.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    glmSTARMA provides estimation, simulation, inference and prediction for spatio-temporal autoregressive GLMs with optional double-GLM dispersion dynamics at fixed locations.

  3. It's all in your head -- fine-tuning arguments do not require aleatoric uncertainty

    physics.hist-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Bayesian statistics supplies an automatic Occam's razor that penalizes unnatural models needing precise fine-tuning to agree with data, justifying naturalness arguments without aleatoric uncertainty.