REVIEW 1 cited by
Revisiting the interacting model of new agegraphic dark energy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Revisiting the interacting model of new agegraphic dark energy
read the original abstract
In this paper, a new version of the interacting model of new agegraphic dark energy (INADE) is proposed and analyzed in detail. The interaction between dark energy and dark matter is reconsidered. The interaction term $Q=bH_0\rho_{\rm de}^\alpha\rho_{\rm dm}^{1-\alpha}$ is adopted, which abandons the Hubble expansion rate $H$ and involves both $\rho_{\rm de}$ and $\rho_{\rm dm}$. Moreover, the new initial condition for the agegraphic dark energy is used, which solves the problem of accommodating baryon matter and radiation in the model. The solution of the model can be given using an iterative algorithm. A concrete example for the calculation of the model is given. Furthermore, the model is constrained by using the combined Planck data (Planck+BAO+SNIa+$H_0$) and the combined WMAP-9 data (WMAP+BAO+SNIa+$H_0$). Three typical cases are considered: (A) $Q=bH_0\rho_{\rm de}$, (B) $Q=bH_0\sqrt{\rho_{\rm de}\rho_{\rm dm}}$, and (C) $Q=bH_0\rho_{\rm dm}$, which correspond to $\alpha=1$, 1/2, and 0, respectively. The departures of the models from the $\Lambda$CDM model are measured by the $\Delta$BIC and $\Delta$AIC values. It is shown that the INADE model is better than the NADE model in the fit, and the INADE(A) model is the best in fitting data among the three cases.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Late-time cosmological constraints on three holographic dark energy models with DESI DR2 BAO and Type Ia supernovae
DESI DR2 and late-time data constrain HDE, ADE and RDE, yielding H0≈67–68 km/s/Mpc, c≈1, n≈2.8, γ≈0.54, with none resolving the Hubble tension or decisively beating ΛCDM.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.