pith. sign in

arxiv: 1401.7320 · v1 · pith:QILVIY6Enew · submitted 2014-01-28 · 🪐 quant-ph

Different Strategies for Optimization Using the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm

Elizabeth Crosson , Edward Farhi , Cedric Yen-Yu Lin , Han-Hsuan Lin , Peter Shor This is my paper
classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords algorithmevolutionquantumadiabaticassignmentinstancesprobabilitystrategies
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present the results of a numerical study, with 20 qubits, of the performance of the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm on randomly generated instances of MAX 2-SAT with a unique assignment that maximizes the number of satisfied clauses. The probability of obtaining this assignment at the end of the quantum evolution measures the success of the algorithm. Here we report three strategies which consistently increase the success probability for the hardest instances in our ensemble: decreasing the overall evolution time, initializing the system in excited states, and adding a random local Hamiltonian to the middle of the evolution.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

    quant-ph 2014-11 accept novelty 9.0

    A p-layer alternating-operator ansatz on n qubits yields approximation ratios that increase with p, achieving ≥0.6924 for MaxCut on 3-regular graphs at p=1 and approaching 1 in the p→∞ adiabatic limit.

  2. Multi-tasking through quantum annealing

    quant-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MTQA embeds multiple NP-hard problems such as minimum vertex cover and graph partitioning into spatially distinct regions on quantum hardware, delivering comparable solution quality to single-task annealing with reduc...