Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Two-size approximation: a simple way of treating the evolution of grain size distribution in galaxies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1412.3866 v1 pith:NTTX6WYI submitted 2014-12-12 astro-ph.GA

Two-size approximation: a simple way of treating the evolution of grain size distribution in galaxies

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords graingrainsdustlargeaccretionsizesmalldistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Full calculations of the evolution of grain size distribution in galaxies are in general computationally heavy. In this paper, we propose a simple model of dust enrichment in a galaxy with a simplified treatment of grain size distribution by imposing a `two-size approximation'; that is, all the grain population is represented by small (grain radius a < 0.03 micron) and large (a > 0.03 micron) grains. We include in the model dust supply from stellar ejecta, destruction in supernova shocks, dust growth by accretion, grain growth by coagulation and grain disruption by shattering, considering how these processes work on the small and large grains. We show that this simple framework reproduces the main features found in full calculations of grain size distributions as follows. The dust enrichment starts with the supply of large grains from stars. At a metallicity level referred to as the critical metallicity of accretion, the abundance of the small grains formed by shattering becomes large enough to rapidly increase the grain abundance by accretion. Associated with this epoch, the mass ratio of the small grains to the large grains reaches the maximum. After that, this ratio converges to the value determined by the balance between shattering and coagulation, and the dust-to-metal ratio is determined by the balance between accretion and shock destruction. With a Monte Carlo simulation, we demonstrate that the simplicity of our model has an advantage in predicting statistical properties. We also show some applications for predicting observational dust properties such as extinction curves.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The COLIBRE-SKIRT pipeline: Calibration-free dust radiative transfer postprocessing for cosmological simulations

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    The COLIBRE-SKIRT pipeline reproduces the observed low-redshift cosmic SED without calibrating the post-processing, using live dust from the simulation and a new 'split & scale' grain-size mapping.

  2. Silicate cosmic dust grain collisions in the interstellar medium: A molecular dynamics study

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MD simulations of 5-50 Å silicate grains find shattering thresholds of ~6 km/s for both SiO2 and astrodust compositions, twice the canonical 2.7 km/s value, with shattered size distributions inconsistent with prior po...

  3. Mass--size evolution and the emerging passive--density relation revealed by JWST/NIRCam in the Spiderweb protocluster

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In the Spiderweb protocluster, passive fraction rises with local density to ~60% while passive mass–size intercepts sit between field and cluster values, indicating advanced quenching but ongoing size growth.

  4. Silicate cosmic dust grain collisions in the interstellar medium: A molecular dynamics study

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MD simulations yield silicate grain shattering thresholds of ~6 km/s and post-collision size distributions inconsistent with power-law predictions from Jones et al. (1996) and Hirashita & Kobayashi (2013).