pith. sign in

arxiv: 1506.03430 · v3 · pith:WXRZ3E3Xnew · submitted 2015-06-10 · 🧮 math.ST · stat.TH

On matrix estimation under monotonicity constraints

classification 🧮 math.ST stat.TH
keywords mathbfthetafactorslogarithmicmatrixriskadaptationconsider
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of estimating an unknown $n_1 \times n_2$ matrix $\mathbf{\theta^*}$ from noisy observations under the constraint that $\mathbf{\theta}^*$ is nondecreasing in both rows and columns. We consider the least squares estimator (LSE) in this setting and study its risk properties. We show that the worst case risk of the LSE is $n^{-1/2}$, up to multiplicative logarithmic factors, where $n = n_1 n_2$ and that the LSE is minimax rate optimal (up to logarithmic factors). We further prove that for some special $\mathbf{\theta}^*$, the risk of the LSE could be much smaller than $n^{-1/2}$; in fact, it could even be parametric i.e., $n^{-1}$ up to logarithmic factors. Such parametric rates occur when the number of "rectangular" blocks of $\mathbf{\theta}^*$ is bounded from above by a constant. We derive, as a consequence, an interesting adaptation property of the LSE which we term variable adaptation -- the LSE performs as well as the oracle estimator when estimating a matrix that is constant along each row/column. Our proofs borrow ideas from empirical process theory and convex geometry and are of independent interest.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning What Evaluators Value: A Reliable Approach to Modeling Evaluator Preferences

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Presents a robust algorithm for learning any coordinate-wise non-decreasing evaluator preference function, with theoretical guarantees that it matches linear performance when linearity holds.