pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1510.04342 · v4 · submitted 2015-10-14 · 📊 stat.ME · math.ST· stat.ML· stat.TH

Recognition: unknown

Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 📊 stat.ME math.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords foresttreatmentcausalforestsrandomeffectcenteredeffects
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Many scientific and engineering challenges -- ranging from personalized medicine to customized marketing recommendations -- require an understanding of treatment effect heterogeneity. In this paper, we develop a non-parametric causal forest for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects that extends Breiman's widely used random forest algorithm. In the potential outcomes framework with unconfoundedness, we show that causal forests are pointwise consistent for the true treatment effect, and have an asymptotically Gaussian and centered sampling distribution. We also discuss a practical method for constructing asymptotic confidence intervals for the true treatment effect that are centered at the causal forest estimates. Our theoretical results rely on a generic Gaussian theory for a large family of random forest algorithms. To our knowledge, this is the first set of results that allows any type of random forest, including classification and regression forests, to be used for provably valid statistical inference. In experiments, we find causal forests to be substantially more powerful than classical methods based on nearest-neighbor matching, especially in the presence of irrelevant covariates.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Concrete Problems in AI Safety

    cs.AI 2016-06 accept novelty 7.0

    The paper categorizes five concrete AI safety problems arising from flawed objectives, costly evaluation, and learning dynamics.

  2. TabPFN-2.5: Advancing the State of the Art in Tabular Foundation Models

    cs.LG 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TabPFN-2.5 scales tabular foundation models to 20x larger datasets, outperforms tuned tree models on TabArena, achieves near-perfect win rates against default XGBoost, and adds a distillation engine for fast productio...