Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hermite polynomials, linear flows on the torus, and an uncertainty principle for roots

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1602.03366 v2 pith:EQXWU2TN submitted 2016-02-10 math.CA

Hermite polynomials, linear flows on the torus, and an uncertainty principle for roots

classification math.CA
keywords polynomialsresultdimensionsflowshermitehigherlinearmathbb
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a recent result of Bourgain, Clozel and Kahane, a version of which states that a sufficiently nice function $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ that coincides with its Fourier transform and vanishes at the origin has a root in the interval $(c, \infty)$, where the optimal $c$ satisfies $0.41 \leq c \leq 0.64$. A similar result holds in higher dimensions. We improve the one-dimensional result to $0.45 \leq c \leq 0.594$, and the lower bound in higher dimensions. We also prove that extremizers exist, and have infinitely many double roots. With this purpose in mind, we establish a new structure statement about Hermite polynomials which relates their pointwise evaluation to linear flows on the torus, and applies to other families of orthogonal polynomials as well.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Linear Programming Bounds for Fibered Sphere Packings

    math.MG 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0

    Linear programming bounds are sharp for some fibered sphere packings, collapse to the planar bound in a key six-dimensional case, and fail to prove the Cohn–Rajagopal conjecture for D5/A3.