REVIEW 3 cited by
UBL: an R package for Utility-based Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This document describes the R package UBL that allows the use of several methods for handling utility-based learning problems. Classification and regression problems that assume non-uniform costs and/or benefits pose serious challenges to predictive analytic tasks. In the context of meteorology, finance, medicine, ecology, among many other, specific domain information concerning the preference bias of the users must be taken into account to enhance the models predictive performance. To deal with this problem, a large number of techniques was proposed by the research community for both classification and regression tasks. The main goal of UBL package is to facilitate the utility-based predictive analytic task by providing a set of methods to deal with this type of problems in the R environment. It is a versatile tool that provides mechanisms to handle both regression and classification (binary and multiclass) tasks. Moreover, UBL package allows the user to specify his domain preferences, but it also provides some automatic methods that try to infer those preference bias from the domain, considering some common known settings.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Instance Hardness-Based Relevance for Imbalanced Regression
An instance-hardness relevance function that labels examples by prediction difficulty improves oversampling for imbalanced regression, with modest empirical gains.
-
Imbalanced Regression Pipeline Recommendation
Meta-IR trains meta-classifiers on 218 datasets to recommend a regression model and a resampling strategy from dataset meta-features, with a chained variant that slightly improves F1-scoreR but not SERA.
-
Resampling strategies for imbalanced regression: a survey and empirical analysis
Across 30 imbalanced regression datasets, resampling strategies improve most models, with GN, RO, and WERCS most often best, and no universally dominant strategy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.