pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1605.07678 · v4 · submitted 2016-05-24 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

An Analysis of Deep Neural Network Models for Practical Applications

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords accuracyanalysisinferencetimeapplicationsconsumptiondeepdnns
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Since the emergence of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) as a prominent technique in the field of computer vision, the ImageNet classification challenge has played a major role in advancing the state-of-the-art. While accuracy figures have steadily increased, the resource utilisation of winning models has not been properly taken into account. In this work, we present a comprehensive analysis of important metrics in practical applications: accuracy, memory footprint, parameters, operations count, inference time and power consumption. Key findings are: (1) power consumption is independent of batch size and architecture; (2) accuracy and inference time are in a hyperbolic relationship; (3) energy constraint is an upper bound on the maximum achievable accuracy and model complexity; (4) the number of operations is a reliable estimate of the inference time. We believe our analysis provides a compelling set of information that helps design and engineer efficient DNNs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DEEP-GAP: Deep-learning Evaluation of Execution Parallelism in GPU Architectural Performance

    cs.PF 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    L4 delivers up to 4.4x higher throughput than T4 for ResNet models, peaks at batch sizes 16-32, and INT8 yields up to 58x gains over CPU baselines.

  2. A Transfer Learning Evaluation of Deep Neural Networks for Image Classification

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Empirical comparison of transfer learning performance across eleven pre-trained models on five image datasets using accuracy, time, and size metrics.