pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1606.05433 · v4 · submitted 2016-06-17 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

FVQA: Fact-based Visual Question Answering

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords fvqaquestionquestionsansweransweringdatasetinformationrequire
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Visual Question Answering (VQA) has attracted a lot of attention in both Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing communities, not least because it offers insight into the relationships between two important sources of information. Current datasets, and the models built upon them, have focused on questions which are answerable by direct analysis of the question and image alone. The set of such questions that require no external information to answer is interesting, but very limited. It excludes questions which require common sense, or basic factual knowledge to answer, for example. Here we introduce FVQA, a VQA dataset which requires, and supports, much deeper reasoning. FVQA only contains questions which require external information to answer. We thus extend a conventional visual question answering dataset, which contains image-question-answerg triplets, through additional image-question-answer-supporting fact tuples. The supporting fact is represented as a structural triplet, such as <Cat,CapableOf,ClimbingTrees>. We evaluate several baseline models on the FVQA dataset, and describe a novel model which is capable of reasoning about an image on the basis of supporting facts.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Towards On-Policy Data Evolution for Visual-Native Multimodal Deep Search Agents

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new image-bank harness and closed-loop on-policy data evolution method raises multimodal agent performance on visual search benchmarks from 24.9% to 39.0% for an 8B model and from 30.6% to 41.5% for a 30B model.