Multi-view Recurrent Neural Acoustic Word Embeddings
read the original abstract
Recent work has begun exploring neural acoustic word embeddings---fixed-dimensional vector representations of arbitrary-length speech segments corresponding to words. Such embeddings are applicable to speech retrieval and recognition tasks, where reasoning about whole words may make it possible to avoid ambiguous sub-word representations. The main idea is to map acoustic sequences to fixed-dimensional vectors such that examples of the same word are mapped to similar vectors, while different-word examples are mapped to very different vectors. In this work we take a multi-view approach to learning acoustic word embeddings, in which we jointly learn to embed acoustic sequences and their corresponding character sequences. We use deep bidirectional LSTM embedding models and multi-view contrastive losses. We study the effect of different loss variants, including fixed-margin and cost-sensitive losses. Our acoustic word embeddings improve over previous approaches for the task of word discrimination. We also present results on other tasks that are enabled by the multi-view approach, including cross-view word discrimination and word similarity.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
PairAlign: A Framework for Sequence Tokenization via Self-Alignment with Applications to Audio Tokenization
PairAlign learns compact audio token sequences via self-alignment of paired content views using an autoregressive decoder, achieving strong cross-view consistency and edit-distance preservation while reducing token co...
-
Multimodal and Multi-view Models for Emotion Recognition
Multimodal training with attention and contrastive multi-view learning improves both combined and acoustic-only emotion recognition on IEMOCAP over prior acoustic baselines.
-
To Tune or Not To Tune? How About the Best of Both Worlds?
A sequential fine-tuning strategy for pre-trained language models reports modest accuracy gains of 4.7%, 0.99%, and 0.72% on semantic similarity, sequence labeling, and text classification tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.