Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
read the original abstract
Recidivism prediction instruments (RPI's) provide decision makers with an assessment of the likelihood that a criminal defendant will reoffend at a future point in time. While such instruments are gaining increasing popularity across the country, their use is attracting tremendous controversy. Much of the controversy concerns potential discriminatory bias in the risk assessments that are produced. This paper discusses several fairness criteria that have recently been applied to assess the fairness of recidivism prediction instruments. We demonstrate that the criteria cannot all be simultaneously satisfied when recidivism prevalence differs across groups. We then show how disparate impact can arise when a recidivism prediction instrument fails to satisfy the criterion of error rate balance.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FairBED: A Bayesian Experimental Design Approach to Gathering Fairer Data
FairBED quantifies dataset fairness as uninformative about sensitive attributes and uses fairness-aware BED to gather data yielding better fairness-accuracy trade-offs than random or standard BED acquisition.
-
An Introduction to Causal Reinforcement Learning
Proposes causal reinforcement learning (CRL) as a framework that decomposes RL environments into structural causal models to unify online, off-policy, and causal learning while defining new tasks including generalized...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.