pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1703.09701 · v2 · submitted 2017-03-28 · 📊 stat.ME · astro-ph.IM· stat.AP

Recognition: unknown

Sampling Errors in Nested Sampling Parameter Estimation

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 📊 stat.ME astro-ph.IMstat.AP
keywords samplingnestederrorsestimationparametermethodaccuracyaccurately
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Sampling errors in nested sampling parameter estimation differ from those in Bayesian evidence calculation, but have been little studied in the literature. This paper provides the first explanation of the two main sources of sampling errors in nested sampling parameter estimation, and presents a new diagrammatic representation for the process. We find no current method can accurately measure the parameter estimation errors of a single nested sampling run, and propose a method for doing so using a new algorithm for dividing nested sampling runs. We empirically verify our conclusions and the accuracy of our new method.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. dynesty: A Dynamic Nested Sampling Package for Estimating Bayesian Posteriors and Evidences

    astro-ph.IM 2019-04 accept novelty 6.0

    dynesty is an open-source Python package for dynamic nested sampling that improves efficiency in Bayesian posterior and evidence estimation compared to MCMC on certain problems.