Bounds on Codes Correcting Tandem and Palindromic Duplications
pith:Q65ATA3R Add to your LaTeX paper
What is a Pith Number?\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{Q65ATA3R}
Prints a linked pith:Q65ATA3R badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more
read the original abstract
In this work, we derive upper bounds on the cardinality of tandem duplication and palindromic deletion correcting codes by deriving the generalized sphere packing bound for these error types. We first prove that an upper bound for tandem deletions is also an upper bound for inserting the respective type of duplications. Therefore, we derive the bounds based on these special deletions as this results in tighter bounds. We determine the spheres for tandem and palindromic duplications/deletions and the number of words with a specific sphere size. Our upper bounds on the cardinality directly imply lower bounds on the redundancy which we compare with the redundancy of the best known construction correcting arbitrary burst errors. Our results indicate that the correction of palindromic duplications requires more redundancy than the correction of tandem duplications. Further, there is a significant gap between the minimum redundancy of duplication correcting codes and burst insertion correcting codes.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Central Limit Theorem for Mutation Systems
A central limit theorem is established for stochastic fluctuations of empirical k-tuple frequencies in mutation systems, with an explicit limiting covariance matrix derived via spectral projection and martingale methods.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.