Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Tutorial on Hawkes Processes for Events in Social Media

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1708.06401 v2 pith:6C63PM43 submitted 2017-08-21 stat.ML cs.SI

A Tutorial on Hawkes Processes for Events in Social Media

classification stat.ML cs.SI
keywords hawkesprocesseseventdataeventsmediapointprocess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This chapter provides an accessible introduction for point processes, and especially Hawkes processes, for modeling discrete, inter-dependent events over continuous time. We start by reviewing the definitions and the key concepts in point processes. We then introduce the Hawkes process, its event intensity function, as well as schemes for event simulation and parameter estimation. We also describe a practical example drawn from social media data - we show how to model retweet cascades using a Hawkes self-exciting process. We presents a design of the memory kernel, and results on estimating parameters and predicting popularity. The code and sample event data are available as an online appendix

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Causal Estimation of Share-Induced Engagement with Flywheel Effects

    stat.ME 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A flow-balance identity yields a closed-form geometric-amplification estimator of the global treatment effect of sharing features under network flywheel interference, with consistency under homogeneity and valid A/A i...

  2. Stability of AI Governance Systems: A Coupled Dynamics Model of Public Trust and Social Disruptions

    cs.CY 2026-03 reject novelty 4.0

    A linear FJ-Hawkes model purports to show when public trust in AI collapses, but the equations make high trust generate more controversy, contradicting the claimed collapse mechanism.