pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1711.05757 · v2 · submitted 2017-11-15 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

The Impact of LHC Jet Data on the MMHT PDF Fit at NNLO

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords dataimpactatlasnnlogluonmmhtcorrectionsdescription
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We investigate the impact of the high precision ATLAS and CMS 7 TeV measurements of inclusive jet production on the MMHT global PDF analysis at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO). This is made possible by the recent completion of the long-term project to calculate the NNLO corrections to the hard cross section. We find that a good description of the ATLAS data is not possible with the default treatment of experimental systematic errors, and develop a simplified solution that retains the dominant physical information of the data. We then investigate the fit quality and the impact on the gluon PDF central value and uncertainty when the ATLAS and CMS data are included in a MMHT fit. We consider both common choices for the factorization and renormalization scale, namely the inclusive jet transverse momentum, $p_\perp$, and the leading jet $p_\perp$, as well as the different jet radii for which the ATLAS and CMS data are made available. We find that the impact of these data on the gluon is relatively insensitive to these inputs, in particular the scale choice, while the inclusion of NNLO corrections tends to improve the data description somewhat, and gives a qualitatively similar though not identical impact on the gluon in comparison to NLO.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Les Houches study on inclusive jet production at NNLO+NNLL

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NNLL resummation shows that scale variations drastically underestimate higher-order uncertainties in NNLO inclusive jet cross sections for typical jet radii, rendering such estimates unreliable.