pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1711.06267 · v3 · submitted 2017-11-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

There is No Missing Satellites Problem

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAhep-ph
keywords satellitesdarkcountsmassmatternumberproblemthere
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A critical challenge to the cold dark matter (CDM) paradigm is that there are fewer satellites observed around the Milky Way than found in simulations of dark matter substructure. We show that there is a match between the observed satellite counts corrected by the detection efficiency of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (for luminosities $L \gtrsim$ 340 L$_\odot$) and the number of luminous satellites predicted by CDM, assuming an empirical relation between stellar mass and halo mass. The "missing satellites problem", cast in terms of number counts, is thus solved. We also show that warm dark matter models with a thermal relic mass smaller than 4 keV are in tension with satellite counts, putting pressure on the sterile neutrino interpretation of recent X-ray observations. Importantly, the total number of Milky Way satellites depends sensitively on the spatial distribution of satellites, possibly leading to a "too many satellites" problem. Measurements of completely dark halos below $10^8$ M$_\odot$, achievable with substructure lensing and stellar stream perturbations, are the next frontier for tests of CDM.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. JWST Lensed Quasar Dark Matter Survey V: Measuring the minimum halo mass with strong gravitational lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Strong lensing of 28 quasars constrains the CDM halo mass function cutoff to m_low < 10^{8.3} solar masses at 10:1 odds.