pith. sign in

arxiv: 1711.08705 · v1 · pith:SHLFZ6A4new · submitted 2017-11-23 · 🧮 math.ST · stat.TH

Risk quantification for the thresholding rule for multiple testing using Gaussian scale mixtures

classification 🧮 math.ST stat.TH
keywords riskbayesianconditionsmultipletestingclassgaussiangive
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper we study the asymptotic properties of Bayesian multiple testing procedures for a large class of Gaussian scale mixture pri- ors. We study two types of multiple testing risks: a Bayesian risk proposed in Bogdan et al. (2011) where the data are assume to come from a mixture of normal, and a frequentist risk similar to the one proposed by Arias-Castro and Chen (2017). Following the work of van der Pas et al. (2016), we give general conditions on the prior such that both risks can be bounded. For the Bayesian risk, the bound is almost sharp. This result show that under these conditions, the considered class of continuous prior can be competitive with the usual two-group model (e.g. spike and slab priors). We also show that if the non-zeros component of the parameter are large enough, the minimax risk can be made asymptotically null. The separation rates obtained are consistent with the one that could be guessed from the existing literature (see van der Pas et al., 2017b). For both problems, we then give conditions under which an adaptive version of the result can be obtained.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multiple testing with the horseshoe

    math.ST 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes FDR-controlling posterior decision rules for signal detection under horseshoe and similar continuous shrinkage priors that attain the optimal detection boundary with asymptotic FDR and FNR control in sparse n...

  2. Multiple testing with the horseshoe

    math.ST 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Proposes FDR-controlling posterior decision rules for horseshoe and similar priors that attain the optimal detection boundary and asymptotic FDR/FNR control in the sparse normal means model.