pith. sign in

arxiv: 1802.07042 · v3 · pith:RG22BSLNnew · submitted 2018-02-20 · 💻 cs.CV

Do deep nets really need weight decay and dropout?

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords capacitydecaydropoutweightdeepregularizationtechniquesablation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The impressive success of modern deep neural networks on computer vision tasks has been achieved through models of very large capacity compared to the number of available training examples. This overparameterization is often said to be controlled with the help of different regularization techniques, mainly weight decay and dropout. However, since these techniques reduce the effective capacity of the model, typically even deeper and wider architectures are required to compensate for the reduced capacity. Therefore, there seems to be a waste of capacity in this practice. In this paper we build upon recent research that suggests that explicit regularization may not be as important as widely believed and carry out an ablation study that concludes that weight decay and dropout may not be necessary for object recognition if enough data augmentation is introduced.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Further advantages of data augmentation on convolutional neural networks

    cs.CV 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Data augmentation enables CNNs to adapt to varying architectures and data amounts without hyperparameter fine-tuning, unlike weight decay and dropout.