pith. sign in

arxiv: 1803.02596 · v2 · pith:5NBH7EQTnew · submitted 2018-03-07 · 📊 stat.ML · cs.LG· stat.ME

Revisiting differentially private linear regression: optimal and adaptive prediction & estimation in unbounded domain

classification 📊 stat.ML cs.LGstat.ME
keywords dataestimationexistingadaptivealgorithmsdifferentialerrorlinear
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We revisit the problem of linear regression under a differential privacy constraint. By consolidating existing pieces in the literature, we clarify the correct dependence of the feature, label and coefficient domains in the optimization error and estimation error, hence revealing the delicate price of differential privacy in statistical estimation and statistical learning. Moreover, we propose simple modifications of two existing DP algorithms: (a) posterior sampling, (b) sufficient statistics perturbation, and show that they can be upgraded into **adaptive** algorithms that are able to exploit data-dependent quantities and behave nearly optimally **for every instance**. Extensive experiments are conducted on both simulated data and real data, which conclude that both AdaOPS and AdaSSP outperform the existing techniques on nearly all 36 data sets that we test on.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Differentially Private Nonparametric Confidence Intervals Under Minimal Distributional Assumptions

    cs.CR 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A black-box resampling procedure produces asymptotically valid and tight differentially private nonparametric confidence intervals for arbitrary quantities from any suitable private estimator.

  2. On the Sample Complexity of Differentially Private Policy Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Differential privacy in policy optimization adds sample complexity costs that often appear as lower-order terms rather than dominating the bounds.