Recognition: unknown
Physical qubit calibration on a directed acyclic graph
read the original abstract
High-fidelity control of qubits requires precisely tuned control parameters. Typically, these parameters are found through a series of bootstrapped calibration experiments which successively acquire more accurate information about a physical qubit. However, optimal parameters are typically different between devices and can also drift in time, which begets the need for an efficient calibration strategy. Here, we introduce a framework to understand the relationship between calibrations as a directed graph. With this approach, calibration is reduced to a graph traversal problem that is automatable and extensible.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Runtime Calibration as State-Trajectory Feedback Control in Quantum-Classical Workflows
Feedback calibration policies outperform open-loop baselines in low-latency quantum runtime regimes when workloads are quality-sensitive and start with aged calibrations.
-
HEOM-in-Calibration-Loop: Exposing Non-Markovian Bath Signatures That Markovian Calibration Elides in Superconducting-Qubit Tune-Up
In pulse-level simulations, HEOM with a Burkard 1/f bath exposes non-Markovian signatures in qubit calibration that Markovian models obscure, with Ramsey T2* differing by at least 13x.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.