pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1803.06386 · v1 · submitted 2018-03-16 · 💻 cs.LG · q-fin.ST· stat.ML

Recognition: unknown

Forecasting Economics and Financial Time Series: ARIMA vs. LSTM

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.LG q-fin.STstat.ML
keywords algorithmsarimaseriestimelstmdatadeepaverage
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Forecasting time series data is an important subject in economics, business, and finance. Traditionally, there are several techniques to effectively forecast the next lag of time series data such as univariate Autoregressive (AR), univariate Moving Average (MA), Simple Exponential Smoothing (SES), and more notably Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) with its many variations. In particular, ARIMA model has demonstrated its outperformance in precision and accuracy of predicting the next lags of time series. With the recent advancement in computational power of computers and more importantly developing more advanced machine learning algorithms and approaches such as deep learning, new algorithms are developed to forecast time series data. The research question investigated in this article is that whether and how the newly developed deep learning-based algorithms for forecasting time series data, such as "Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)", are superior to the traditional algorithms. The empirical studies conducted and reported in this article show that deep learning-based algorithms such as LSTM outperform traditional-based algorithms such as ARIMA model. More specifically, the average reduction in error rates obtained by LSTM is between 84 - 87 percent when compared to ARIMA indicating the superiority of LSTM to ARIMA. Furthermore, it was noticed that the number of training times, known as "epoch" in deep learning, has no effect on the performance of the trained forecast model and it exhibits a truly random behavior.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TempusBench: An Evaluation Framework for Time-Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TempusBench is a new evaluation framework for time-series forecasting models that supplies fresh non-overlapping datasets, tasks beyond horizon and domain, consistent tuning across models, and visualization tools.

  2. Channel-wise Retrieval for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CRAFT improves multivariate time series forecasting accuracy by performing independent channel-wise retrieval via time-domain sparse pruning followed by frequency-domain spectral ranking.