pith. sign in

arxiv: 1803.09544 · v3 · pith:5V4RK32Hnew · submitted 2018-03-26 · 💻 cs.PL · cs.LG

A General Path-Based Representation for Predicting Program Properties

classification 💻 cs.PL cs.LG
keywords learningrepresentationdifferentprogramsgenerallanguagesnamespredicting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Predicting program properties such as names or expression types has a wide range of applications. It can ease the task of programming and increase programmer productivity. A major challenge when learning from programs is $\textit{how to represent programs in a way that facilitates effective learning}$. We present a $\textit{general path-based representation}$ for learning from programs. Our representation is purely syntactic and extracted automatically. The main idea is to represent a program using paths in its abstract syntax tree (AST). This allows a learning model to leverage the structured nature of code rather than treating it as a flat sequence of tokens. We show that this representation is general and can: (i) cover different prediction tasks, (ii) drive different learning algorithms (for both generative and discriminative models), and (iii) work across different programming languages. We evaluate our approach on the tasks of predicting variable names, method names, and full types. We use our representation to drive both CRF-based and word2vec-based learning, for programs of four languages: JavaScript, Java, Python and C\#. Our evaluation shows that our approach obtains better results than task-specific handcrafted representations across different tasks and programming languages.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dissecting model behavior through agent trajectories

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SSA harness matches frontier model pass@1 scores on agent benchmarks and 138k trajectory analysis in code state-spaces shows model-specific differences in edit frequency, testing activity, and phase transitions.