pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1805.04941 · v2 · submitted 2018-05-13 · ✦ hep-lat · cond-mat.str-el· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

A simple approach towards the sign problem using path optimisation

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification ✦ hep-lat cond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords problemsignapproachlatticeparametersapproxcontourdeformation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We suggest an approach for simulating theories with a sign problem that relies on optimisation of complex integration contours that are not restricted to lie along Lefschetz thimbles. To that end we consider the toy model of a one-dimensional Bose gas with chemical potential. We identify the main contribution to the sign problem in this case as coming from a nearest neighbour interaction and approximately cancel it by an explicit deformation of the integration contour. We extend the obtained expressions to more general ones, depending on a small set of parameters. We find the optimal values of these parameters on a small lattice and study their range of validity. We also identify precursors for the onset of the sign problem. A fast method of evaluating the Jacobian related to the contour deformation is proposed and its numerical stability is examined. For a particular choice of lattice parameters, we find that our approach increases the lattice size at which the sign problem becomes serious from $L \approx 32$ to $L \approx 700$. The efficient evaluation of the Jacobian ($O(L)$ for a sweep) results in running times that are of the order of a few minutes on a standard laptop.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Correctness criteria for complex Langevin

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A comparison of prominent correctness criteria for complex Langevin dynamics on four simple models shows differences in applicability, ease of use, and predictive power.