REVIEW 5 cited by
Uniqueness in Harper's vertex-isoperimetric theorem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Uniqueness in Harper's vertex-isoperimetric theorem
read the original abstract
For a set $A\subseteq Q_{n}=\left\{ 0,1\right\} ^{n}$ the $t$-neighbourhood of $A$ is $N^{t}\left(A\right)=\left\{ x\,:\,d\left(x,A\right)\leq t\right\}$, where $d$ denotes the usual graph distance on $Q_{n}$. Harper's vertex-isoperimetric theorem states that among the subsets $A\subseteq Q_{n}$ of given size, the size of the $t$-neighbourhood is minimised when $A$ is taken to be an initial segment of the simplicial order. Aubrun and Szarek asked the following question: if $A\subseteq Q_{n}$ is a subset of given size for which the sizes of both $N^{t}\left(A\right)$ and $N^{t}\left(A^{c}\right)$ are minimal for all $t>0$, does it follow that $A$ is isomorphic to an initial segment of the simplicial order? Our aim is to give a counterexample. Surprisingly it turns out that there is no counterexample that is a Hamming ball, meaning a set that lies between two consecutive exact Hamming balls, i.e.\ a set $A$ with $B\left(x,r\right)\subseteq A\subseteq B\left(x,r+1\right)$ for some $x\in Q_{n}$. We go further to classify all the sets $A\subseteq Q_{n}$ for which the sizes of both $N^{t}\left(A\right)$ and $N^{t}\left(A^{c}\right)$ are minimal for all $t>0$ among the subsets of $Q_{n}$ of given size. We also prove that, perhaps surprisingly, if $A\subseteq Q_{n}$ for which the sizes of $N\left(A\right)$ and $N\left(A^{c}\right)$ are minimal among the subsets of $Q_{n}$ of given size, then the sizes of both $N^{t}\left(A\right)$ and $N^{t}\left(A^{c}\right)$ are also minimal for all $t>0$ among the subsets of $Q_{n}$ of given size. Hence the same classification also holds when we only require $N\left(A\right)$ and $N\left(A^{c}\right)$ to have minimal size among the subsets $A\subseteq Q_{n}$ of given size.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Charting the Galactic Underworld I: Comprehensive simulations of the kinematics, rates, and demographics of Milky Way black holes
Self-consistent binary evolution plus galactic orbits predict ~1.7×10^8 Milky Way black holes, 91% isolated, in a disk ~2.5× thicker than visible stars, with massive BHs preferentially near the plane.
-
MICONIC: The spatial relationship between star formation and the AGN in Centaurus A revealed by JWST/MIRI
JWST/MIRI finds 928 red IR-excess sources aligned with Cen A's warped disc and not the radio jet, indicating merger-driven embedded star formation.
-
Direct Evidence for Outflow Driven by Wolf-Rayet Stars in the Nearby Galaxy PGC44685
MEGARA IFU data show a WR-driven [O III] outflow of mass ~8e3 Msun and rate ~9e-4 Msun/yr in PGC 44685, with only ~0.35% energy-loading efficiency on ~120 pc scales.
-
Habitable Zones Around Massive Stars: From the Main Sequence to Supergiants
Operational habitable zones around massive stars exist on the main sequence only below about 10–15 solar masses and reopen briefly after it, contributing roughly 1e-4 of the Galaxy's habitable planet-time.
-
SN 2024abvb: A Type Icn Supernova in the Outskirts of its Host Galaxy
SN 2024abvb is a newly classified luminous Type Icn supernova whose fitted ejecta mass (~0.12 Msun) implies an extremely stripped progenitor.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.