pith. sign in

arxiv: 1807.02478 · v1 · pith:LJAHIV3Lnew · submitted 2018-07-04 · 💻 cs.CL

CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Prediction

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords judgmentdatasetpredictionlegalcasesresultstextbfbaselines
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce the \textbf{C}hinese \textbf{AI} and \textbf{L}aw challenge dataset (CAIL2018), the first large-scale Chinese legal dataset for judgment prediction. \dataset contains more than $2.6$ million criminal cases published by the Supreme People's Court of China, which are several times larger than other datasets in existing works on judgment prediction. Moreover, the annotations of judgment results are more detailed and rich. It consists of applicable law articles, charges, and prison terms, which are expected to be inferred according to the fact descriptions of cases. For comparison, we implement several conventional text classification baselines for judgment prediction and experimental results show that it is still a challenge for current models to predict the judgment results of legal cases, especially on prison terms. To help the researchers make improvements on legal judgment prediction, both \dataset and baselines will be released after the CAIL competition\footnote{http://cail.cipsc.org.cn/}.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Retrieval-Based Multi-Label Legal Annotation: Extensible, Data-Efficient and Hallucination-Free

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Retrieval with frozen embeddings and k-NN delivers competitive accuracy, high data efficiency, and zero hallucinations on legal multi-label annotation across ECtHR and Eurlex datasets.