Hierarchical Multitask Learning for CTC-based Speech Recognition
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:X6NAVNZIrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Previous work has shown that neural encoder-decoder speech recognition can be improved with hierarchical multitask learning, where auxiliary tasks are added at intermediate layers of a deep encoder. We explore the effect of hierarchical multitask learning in the context of connectionist temporal classification (CTC)-based speech recognition, and investigate several aspects of this approach. Consistent with previous work, we observe performance improvements on telephone conversational speech recognition (specifically the Eval2000 test sets) when training a subword-level CTC model with an auxiliary phone loss at an intermediate layer. We analyze the effects of a number of experimental variables (like interpolation constant and position of the auxiliary loss function), performance in lower-resource settings, and the relationship between pretraining and multitask learning. We observe that the hierarchical multitask approach improves over standard multitask training in our higher-data experiments, while in the low-resource settings standard multitask training works well. The best results are obtained by combining hierarchical multitask learning and pretraining, which improves word error rates by 3.4% absolute on the Eval2000 test sets.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Progressive Alignment Objectives for Aligner-Encoder based ASR
InterAligner and InterCTC enable progressive alignment in Aligner-Encoder ASR, lowering LibriSpeech WER from 5.0/7.8 to 3.1/5.6 with gains on long utterances.
-
Progressive Alignment Objectives for Aligner-Encoder based ASR
InterAligner adds progressive intermediate alignment objectives plus InterCTC to Aligner-Encoder ASR, cutting WER from 5.0/7.8 to 3.1/5.6 on LibriSpeech test-clean/other with largest gains on long utterances.
-
Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances
Probing classifiers are a common but limited method for analyzing linguistic knowledge in neural NLP models, and this review outlines their promises, methodological shortcomings, and recent advances.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.