REVIEW 2 cited by
Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Abusive language detection models tend to have a problem of being biased toward identity words of a certain group of people because of imbalanced training datasets. For example, "You are a good woman" was considered "sexist" when trained on an existing dataset. Such model bias is an obstacle for models to be robust enough for practical use. In this work, we measure gender biases on models trained with different abusive language datasets, while analyzing the effect of different pre-trained word embeddings and model architectures. We also experiment with three bias mitigation methods: (1) debiased word embeddings, (2) gender swap data augmentation, and (3) fine-tuning with a larger corpus. These methods can effectively reduce gender bias by 90-98% and can be extended to correct model bias in other scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Bias, Accuracy, and Trust: Gender-Diverse Perspectives on Large Language Models
Gender-diverse users perceive ChatGPT's gender bias differently, with non-binary/transgender participants reporting condescending and stereotypical responses, and men reporting higher trust.
-
Statistical Hypothesis Testing for Auditing Robustness in Language Models
A permutation-based hypothesis test on pairwise semantic similarities detects whether LLM outputs shift under arbitrary input or model perturbations.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.