Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Faster super-resolution imaging with auto-correlation two-step deconvolution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.07410 v4 pith:MWK5ANVB submitted 2018-09-19 physics.optics

classification physics.optics
keywords super-resolutionimagingsacdauto-correlationdeconvolutionimageopticalresolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite super-resolution fluorescence blinking microscopes break the diffraction limit, the intense phototoxic illumination and long-term image sequences thus far still pose to major challenges in visualizing live-organisms. Here, we proposed a super-resolution method based on auto-correlation two-step deconvolution (SACD) to enhance the temporal resolution at lower signal intensity levels. Unlike conventional techniques, such as super-resolution optical fluctuation imaging (SOFI) or stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM), our model allows 16 frames to generate super-resolution images, without noticeable degradation in recording quality. We demonstrate SACD both in simulated predictions and experimental validations, with the resulting spatial resolution of 64 nm and 2-10 fold speed improvements. The use of low signal-to-noise ratio acquisition of image sequences, our SACD enables fast, background-free, super-resolution imaging that maybe advance implemented as a suitable tool for rapid live-cells imaging.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. VQualA 2025 Challenge on Visual Quality Comparison for Large Multimodal Models: Methods and Results

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A challenge report finding that ensemble-tuned LMMs reach 75.7% accuracy on a 4,000-question visual quality comparison benchmark, only ~0.2 points above a Qwen2.5-VL-72B baseline.

Pith tools