REVIEW 3 cited by
Aleph: A Leaderless, Asynchronous, Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus Protocol
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Aleph: A Leaderless, Asynchronous, Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus Protocol
read the original abstract
In this paper we propose Aleph, a leaderless, fully asynchronous, Byzantine fault tolerant consensus protocol for ordering messages exchanged among processes. It is based on a distributed construction of a partially ordered set and the algorithm for reaching a consensus on its extension to a total order. To achieve the consensus, the processes perform computations based only on a local copy of the data structure, however, they are bound to end with the same results. Our algorithm uses a dual-threshold coin-tossing scheme as a randomization strategy and establishes the agreement in an expected constant number of rounds. In addition, we introduce a fast way of validating messages that can occur prior to determining the total ordering. This version of the protocol is deprecated. For current version see arXiv:1908.05156.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Multimmit: Extending Blocks for Faster Finality
Multimmit finalises transaction blocks in one voting round with roughly 3δ average latency from dissemination, confining a faulty producer's damage to its own chain.
-
The Carnot Bound: Limits and Possibilities for Bandwidth-Efficient Consensus
A lower bound of ~2.5 on data expansion for 2-round-finality consensus, plus two 3-round protocols that achieve expansion approaching 1 under good conditions.
-
The Carnot Bound: Limits and Possibilities for Bandwidth-Efficient Consensus
Two-round-finality leader-based consensus cannot beat ~2.5 data expansion; three-round Carnot protocols reach near-1 under favorable conditions and 1.33–1.5 under attack.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.