pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1902.03271 · v1 · submitted 2019-02-08 · 💻 cs.AI · stat.AP

Recognition: unknown

Does the "Artificial Intelligence Clinician" learn optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care?

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.AI stat.AP
keywords clinicianartificialintelligencehealthcarelearningmachinesepsistreatment
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

From 2017 to 2018 the number of scientific publications found via PubMed search using the keyword "Machine Learning" increased by 46% (4,317 to 6,307). The results of studies involving machine learning, artificial intelligence (AI), and big data have captured the attention of healthcare practitioners, healthcare managers, and the public at a time when Western medicine grapples with unmitigated cost increases and public demands for accountability. The complexity involved in healthcare applications of machine learning and the size of the associated data sets has afforded many researchers an uncontested opportunity to satisfy these demands with relatively little oversight. In a recent Nature Medicine article, "The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care," Komorowski and his coauthors propose methods to train an artificial intelligence clinician to treat sepsis patients with vasopressors and IV fluids. In this post, we will closely examine the claims laid out in this paper. In particular, we will study the individual treatment profiles suggested by their AI Clinician to gain insight into how their AI Clinician intends to treat patients on an individual level.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The hidden risks of temporal resampling in clinical reinforcement learning

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Resampling clinical time series into uniform bins for offline RL reduces performance by up to 60% and causes retrospective evaluations to overestimate returns by 1.5-3x versus unprocessed data.