pith. sign in

arxiv: 1902.04818 · v2 · pith:F7UD5LG6new · submitted 2019-02-13 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

The Odds are Odd: A Statistical Test for Detecting Adversarial Examples

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords testadversarialstatisticsunderattacksconditionsexamplesthey
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We investigate conditions under which test statistics exist that can reliably detect examples, which have been adversarially manipulated in a white-box attack. These statistics can be easily computed and calibrated by randomly corrupting inputs. They exploit certain anomalies that adversarial attacks introduce, in particular if they follow the paradigm of choosing perturbations optimally under p-norm constraints. Access to the log-odds is the only requirement to defend models. We justify our approach empirically, but also provide conditions under which detectability via the suggested test statistics is guaranteed to be effective. In our experiments, we show that it is even possible to correct test time predictions for adversarial attacks with high accuracy.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Defending Adversarial Attacks by Correcting logits

    cs.LG 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A two-layer network trained on mixed clean and perturbed logits recovers original predictions for a range of adversarial attacks without needing image data.