The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 1903.01039 · v4 · pith:RW2JLI3H · submitted 2019-03-04 · cs.CL

SECNLP: A Survey of Embeddings in Clinical Natural Language Processing

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:RW2JLI3Hrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL
keywords embeddingsclinicaldiscussrepresentationssurveyvariouswellembedding
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Traditional representations like Bag of words are high dimensional, sparse and ignore the order as well as syntactic and semantic information. Distributed vector representations or embeddings map variable length text to dense fixed length vectors as well as capture the prior knowledge which can transferred to downstream tasks. Even though embedding has become de facto standard for representations in deep learning based NLP tasks in both general and clinical domains, there is no survey paper which presents a detailed review of embeddings in Clinical Natural Language Processing. In this survey paper, we discuss various medical corpora and their characteristics, medical codes and present a brief overview as well as comparison of popular embeddings models. We classify clinical embeddings into nine types and discuss each embedding type in detail. We discuss various evaluation methods followed by possible solutions to various challenges in clinical embeddings. Finally, we conclude with some of the future directions which will advance the research in clinical embeddings.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Language Models as Interfaces, Not Oracles: A Hybrid LLM-ML System for Pediatric Appendicitis

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A hybrid LLM-ML pipeline extracts features from clinical narratives and applies XGBoost for more stable pediatric appendicitis diagnosis than end-to-end LLMs.