REVIEW 2 cited by
Symmetry energy at supra-saturation densities via the Gravitational Waves from GW170817
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Motivated by the historical detection of gravitational waves from GW170817, the neutron star and the neutron drop, i.e., a certain number of neutrons confined in an external field, are systematically investigated by ab initio calculations as well as the nonrelativistic and relativistic state-of-art density functional theories. Strong correlations are found among the neutron star tidal deformability, the neutron star radius, the root-mean-square radii of neutron drops, and the symmetry energies of nuclear matter at supra-saturation densities. From these correlations and the upper limit on the tidal deformability extracted from GW170817, the neutron star radii, the neutron drop radii, and the symmetry energy at twice saturation density are respectively constrained as $R_{1.4M_{\odot}}\leqslant 12.94$ km, $R_{\rm nd} \leqslant 2.36$ fm, and $E_{\mathrm{sym}}(2\rho_0) \leqslant 53.2$ MeV.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Nuclear and neutron matter in the relativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock theory with next-to-leading order covariant chiral nuclear force
The authors find that NLO covariant chiral nuclear forces in relativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock theory reproduce the empirical saturation energy, density, and incompressibility of symmetric nuclear matter at cutoff 5...
-
The key factor to determine the relation between radius and tidal deformability of neutron stars: slope of symmetry energy
For 1.4 solar mass neutron stars the radius-deformability relation is nearly independent of higher-order nuclear parameters but strongly depends on the symmetry energy slope L, and the relation fails for 1.8 solar mass stars.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.